[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Date Index][Thread Index]
C++ unimplemented "delete foo;" suggestion
- To: <eric>, <heh>, <ravi>, <dean>
- Subject: C++ unimplemented "delete foo;" suggestion
- From: Mark S. Miller <mark>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jan 90 21:48:05 PST
- Cc: <xtech>
How about:
#define DELETE(sptr) (sptr.delete())
And have the translator translate
foo delete.
into
DELETE(foo)
? SPTRs would define a "delete()" method that would do a real delete
on their internal pointer. This should be a much less ugly way to get
around the C++ unimplemented cases than introducing a temporary wimpy
variable. What do y'all think?