[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "LUX vs. NUSL < XU
- To: xanadu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: "LUX vs. NUSL < XU
- From: "Tom P. Hooter" <eyecon@xxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 24 Sep 97 23:48:17 +0200
- Reply-to: xanadu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I do prefer if we used LUX instead of NUSL for a naming,
it does sound so good : LUX !!!
>"Universal Structure Level" is basically the concept. However,
> "USL" doesn't sound great. I am considering two other names
> in particular: LUX and NUSL.
>LUX (Level of Universal Structure) sounds nice-- Light and Luxury,
> deluxe, Luxor-- but not many people know that "X" xtands for
> Xtructure !-)
>NUSL is therefore my favorite. If so, where the "N" is to have
> come from has to be decided. Possibilities include
>Natural (sounds very Ecological, Environmental-Safe).
>Suggestions welcome across this whole problem.
Read you soon
-> Tom P. Hooter at Eye Cont@ct <-