[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: File names mangled for MS-DOS

> Old Name		New Name
> .h			c.h
> .c			c.c
> .o			c.o
> .hxx			c.hxx
> .cxx			x.cxx
> .o			x.o

Shouldn't those last three be either

  .hxx			x.hxx
  .cxx			x.cxx
  .o			x.o


  .hxx			c.hxx
  .cxx			c.cxx
  .o			c.o

?  (BTW, I prefer the latter, but only slightly.  Is there some reason
to mark .o files with their origin as c++ source?  We should never have
both a Foo.c and a Foo.cxx, because some c++ compiler systems may produce
a temporary Foo.c file in the directory containing the Foo.cxx.)